Journal article
2020
#iopsych #personality #psychometrics #quantmethods
Assistant Professor, Industrial-Organizational Psychology + Quantitative Methods
Department of Psychological Sciences
472 Sewall Hall
Rice University, MS-25
6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005 USA
#iopsych #personality #psychometrics #quantmethods
Department of Psychological Sciences
472 Sewall Hall
Rice University, MS-25
6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005 USA
APA
Click to copy
Zhang, B., Sun, T., Cao, M., & Drasgow, F. (2020). Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Zhang, Bo, Tianjun Sun, Mengyang Cao, and F. Drasgow. “Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions” (2020).
MLA
Click to copy
Zhang, Bo, et al. Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions. 2020.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{bo2020a,
title = {Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions},
year = {2020},
author = {Zhang, Bo and Sun, Tianjun and Cao, Mengyang and Drasgow, F.}
}
The use of bifactor models has increased substantially in the past decade. However, bifactor models are prone to a nonidentification problem in the context of prediction that is not well recognized in the general research community. Moreover, the practical consequences of adopting different conceptualizations of hierarchical constructs when examining their predictive validity has received little attention. Therefore, Study 1 examined the statistical performance of bifactor models and investigated the effectiveness of an augmentation strategy to remedy the nonidentification problem. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the augmentation strategy is effective. The second simulation study demonstrated that researchers may arrive at different conclusions regarding the predictive validity of hierarchical constructs depending on their choice of models. In general, augmented bifactor models, which are restricted variants of the more general bifactor-(S·I-1) model, reasonably recovered the overall predictive validity (R 2) of hierarchical constructs and led to correct substantive conclusions regarding the incremental validity of facets regardless of the true data-generation model given a sufficiently large sample (n ≥ 600). The authors discussed implications of those findings and made practical recommendations for further users of bifactor models.